Thinking of the calamity and human rights
http://m.huffpost.com/jp/entry/11186432
Conversations after this calamity.....
（Recently, after a calamity , which one stubbed 19 people to death and hurt 26 people in a facility for the mentally handicapped,
many people around me have often broached the topic
about death penalty, the human rights of perpetrators and the judicial system.
"Should death penalty be abolished?"
I advocate " Yes " 【under several conditions】.)
And there, almost people vented their anger and frustration to this culprit and judicial system at present. （I and They were drunk.）
Not logically and sentimentally they contended that .......
" the perpetrators should be executed immediately!
The death penalty at present in JP Not commensurate with his felony.
It's natural to execute publicly as cruel as they can !
The discussion of abolishing death penalty is itself extremely Ridiculous !! "
"If I were the close of victims, I myself KILL him!
Nation deprive us of the natural right to REVENGE so it must be fulfill its responsibilities of the deprivation by Slaughtering him."
" 〈 Alisa, you are opposed to death penalty .〉
If you were deprived of your close people, still you advocate it?
You really would not Kill the perpetrator? "
Moreover,
" 【Education & Rehabilitation for perpetrators 】?
Extremely Ridiculous!
It costs much Money ! They are NEVER worth being educated and rehabilitated.
There is no concept of human rights for culprits.
Instantly they must be executed! "
One refuted that
" There is three court system,
it's sufficient for avoiding false accusation .
It's sufficient for protecting human rights of perpetrators. "
I conceive that
If a calamity like this occurred in our Uni ,
and he slaughtered my teachers and friends who
I really love and cherish from my heart,
I think I would go mud and commit suicide ....?
Nevertheless,
However,
Still,
I would NOT try to slaughter the criminal by myself.
If I could not but do like that, I went against humanity,
I would not hope staying alive .......perhaps I 'd rather commit suicide .
お酒の席とはいえ、ほとんどの人たちが私とは真逆の主張を非論理的に感情的にぶちまけた……
「加害者は、即、死刑にすべきだ。日本の現在の死刑制度は、罪に釣り合わない！
できるだけ残虐な方法で公開処刑にすべきだ！
死刑制度の廃止なんてバカげている。」
「私が、被害者の近しい人なら、私自身で殺る！！
その当然の権利を、国家が奪ってるのだから、その責任を(残虐な刑罰で）果たすべきだ！」
「『Alisa、死刑制度に反対なんでしょ？』
Alisaの大切な人が被害者でも、そう主張するのか？
犯人を殺さないのか？」
「『加害者に教育、更生』？ 無理でしょう。
大体、お金がかかるのに、なんで、そんなヤツにお金をかけるんだ？. 犯罪者に人権などない！
即、殺して消すしかない！ 」
云々。
私の意見に対する反論には、こんなものがあった。
「だから、【三審制】なんじゃないか。
冤罪を防ぐためにも、人権のためにも、三審制で十分だ！」
私は、「私たちの学校でこのような事件が起きて、
私の本当に大切な愛する先生と友達が被害者になったら・・・」ということを想像した。
私は、本当にそうなったら、気が狂って自殺をするかもしれない……
それでも、
それでも、
それでも、
私は、私自身が加害者を残虐な方法で殺したい、とは思わないだろう。
私まで、そんな人道に反した行動を犯すしかないのなら、私は生きていたくない……自殺のほうがマシかもしれない。
